The Man Who Hated Women: Sex, Censorship, and Civil Liberties in the Gilded Age

The Man Who Hated Women: Sex, Censorship, and Civil Liberties in the Gilded Age

  • Downloads:8532
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-07-08 17:30:56
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Amy Sohn
  • ISBN:1250174813
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Author Amy Sohn presents a narrative history of Anthony Comstock, anti-vice activist and U。S。 Postal Inspector, and the remarkable women who opposed his war on women's rights at the turn of the twentieth century。

Anthony Comstock, special agent to the Post Office, was one of the most important men in the lives of nineteenth-century women。 His eponymous law, passed in 1873, penalized the mailing of contraception and obscenity with harsh sentences and steep fines; his name was soon equated with repression and prudery。

Between 1873 and the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920, eight remarkable women were tried under the Comstock Law。 These "sex radicals" supported contraception, sexual education, gender equality, and a woman's right to sexual pleasure。 They took on Comstock in explicit, bold, personal writing, seeking to redefine work, family, sex, and love for a new era。

The Man Who Hated Women tells the overlooked story of their valiant attempts to fight Comstock in court and the press。 They were publishers, editors, and doctors, including the first woman presidential candidate, Victoria C。 Woodhull; the birth control activist Margaret Sanger; and the anarchist Emma Goldman。 In their willingness to go against a monomaniac who viewed reproductive rights as a threat to the American family, they paved the way for modern-day feminism。 Risking imprisonment and death, they redefined contraceptive access as a human civil liberty。

Download

Reviews

Thomas Little

Author was on NPR being interviewed by Terry Gross today。 Some new material on Comstock however I find the title sensationalistic, Comstock was just an overzealous reformer and crusader from the 19th century who enforced the law against real frauds and became fanatical in the reproductive and sexual sphere as most Victorians were。There have been a number of important biographies of Comstock with commentaries from people like Hayward Broun。 It's easy to be critical of Comstock over 100 years afte Author was on NPR being interviewed by Terry Gross today。 Some new material on Comstock however I find the title sensationalistic, Comstock was just an overzealous reformer and crusader from the 19th century who enforced the law against real frauds and became fanatical in the reproductive and sexual sphere as most Victorians were。There have been a number of important biographies of Comstock with commentaries from people like Hayward Broun。 It's easy to be critical of Comstock over 100 years after his passing。 You have to ask how the people of that time would feel about how our culture has tilted far in the other direction? 。。。more

Jennifer

Anthony Comstock, special agent to the Post Office, was one of the most important men in the lives of nineteenth-century women。 His eponymous law, passed in 1873, penalized the mailing of contraception and obscenity, and his name was soon equated with repression and prudery。Between 1873 and the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920, eight remarkable women, also known as "sex radicals," supported contraception, sexual education, gender equality, and a woman's right to sexual pleasure。 Anthony Comstock, special agent to the Post Office, was one of the most important men in the lives of nineteenth-century women。 His eponymous law, passed in 1873, penalized the mailing of contraception and obscenity, and his name was soon equated with repression and prudery。Between 1873 and the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920, eight remarkable women, also known as "sex radicals," supported contraception, sexual education, gender equality, and a woman's right to sexual pleasure。 The Man Who Hated Women tells the overlooked story of their valiant attempts to fight Comstock in court and the press。 Risking imprisonment and death, they redefined contraceptive access as a human civil liberty。Author Amy Sohn does bring these women's stories to life。 While the content is very graphic sexually - both in the descriptions of sexual encounters and talk about sex norms of the time - the story is important。 These eight women and many other men and women fought for freedoms。Still 140 years later, women still fight for the right to sexual freedom and the control of their bodies。 This book can encourage us to keep fighting。 。。。more

Filipa Perry

Was really looking forward to this one, but it was a disappointment。 It reads like a morality play with caricatures of “good” and “bad” guys。 The author trips over herself to convey how evil Anthony Comstock was, including by portraying him as obese and physically grotesque。 (Authors: you don’t need to resort to these tactics; let people’s repulsive words and actions speak for themselves。) She also takes pains to redeem Sanger and her peers from their flaws, such as by writing that Sanger held v Was really looking forward to this one, but it was a disappointment。 It reads like a morality play with caricatures of “good” and “bad” guys。 The author trips over herself to convey how evil Anthony Comstock was, including by portraying him as obese and physically grotesque。 (Authors: you don’t need to resort to these tactics; let people’s repulsive words and actions speak for themselves。) She also takes pains to redeem Sanger and her peers from their flaws, such as by writing that Sanger held views that would be abhorrent to people today。 Sanger held views that were abhorrent to people in HER day。 In fact, many of her religious critics were among those to declare eugenics intrinsically evil。 Why does she get the benefit of being “of her times,” but Comstock does not? Don’t get me wrong, I agree with the author’s general framing。 But history is messy, and authors have a responsibility to capture—or at least try to capture—the nuance。 I think it would only strengthen her project if she didn’t try so hard to make things black and white。One strength of this book is that the author acknowledges the spiritual/religious motivations of early feminists and sex radicals。 Too many writers today try to sanitize progressive figures of their faith, which is one reason why modern-day Comstocks enjoy so much cultural authority。 。。。more

Aiya

I really enjoyed this book。 it is a great first introduction to this era of history。At times the story felt a little watered down and oversimplified, there wasn't much context provided for the time period for how revolutionary it truly was for women to write/publish books and speak at conventions。 Most of the narratives were fully fleshed out and went very in-depth in the short amount of time provided to each woman。Comstock was a man who represented all the worst parts of the era he grew up in, I really enjoyed this book。 it is a great first introduction to this era of history。At times the story felt a little watered down and oversimplified, there wasn't much context provided for the time period for how revolutionary it truly was for women to write/publish books and speak at conventions。 Most of the narratives were fully fleshed out and went very in-depth in the short amount of time provided to each woman。Comstock was a man who represented all the worst parts of the era he grew up in, and his misogyny played a massive role in the development of contraceptive and abortion laws。 I think this is a definite must-read for anyone interested in reproductive laws and the impact of Christian morality on the accessibility of abortion。 。。。more

Jenny

Anthony Comstock was a misogynistic zealot。 This book provides a good window into his reign of terror, although there are some missteps。 Sohn oversimplifies some of the collateral information she provides and doesn’t provide much in the way of historical context。 I am a harsh critic - American women’s history 1840-1880 is my area of expertise。 The first half of this book brought out old friends and old scandals: Victoria Woodhull and Tennje Claflin, the Beecher-Tilton scandal, the free lovers, s Anthony Comstock was a misogynistic zealot。 This book provides a good window into his reign of terror, although there are some missteps。 Sohn oversimplifies some of the collateral information she provides and doesn’t provide much in the way of historical context。 I am a harsh critic - American women’s history 1840-1880 is my area of expertise。 The first half of this book brought out old friends and old scandals: Victoria Woodhull and Tennje Claflin, the Beecher-Tilton scandal, the free lovers, spiritualists, and suffragists。 A lot of this was oversimplified in the book and Sohn fails to discuss how novel women speaking in public still was in the early days of Comstockery。 This would have provided a lot more context to why Comstock was what he was and did what he did and why he had so much support。Still, if you’re not overly familiar with this area of history, Sohn presents a fine introduction。 。。。more